Feedback - Project Presentation: Group 2

Christoph, Norbert, Peter: Business Start-Ups

Click here to watch the recording of the project presentation. To evaluate your performance or give this group some feedback, fill in the form below.

Your name:

Consider the following points:

what was good?
what could be improved?
nice introduction?
clear overview?
clear structure?
interesting content?
clear 'signposting'?
good body language?
eye contact?
audience involvement?
designing and using visuals?
language?

 

How did everyone do?

Christoph

Norbert

Peter

 

Reload this page to see feedback submitted below:

name: Norbert
B1: Submit
Date: August 23, 2001
Time: 11:04

christoph_feedback

Good: Clear voice, easy to understand

Improveable: maybe a bit dry for people who are not familiar with business

Introduction: good and short

Overview: good

Interesting Content: Yes, but maybe a bit dry

'Signposting': good

Body language: good (and formal)

Eye contact: Yes, but could be improved

Audience involvement: no

Visuals: good (easy to read, supported the speaker)

Language: clear

P.S.: You were so good! Ahhhh, sorry... You was so good! :)

norbert_feedback

Good: Easy to understand (I hope so...)

Improveable: more eye contact, less reading

Introduction: ok

Overview: IMHO ok

Interesting Content: Yes, but maybe a bit dry

'Signposting': ?

Body language: too nervous

Eye contact: not enough

Audience involvement: no

Visuals: good (easy to read, supported the speaker)

Language: clear

peter_feedback

Good: Easy to understand, free talk, it seems that he was really interested in his topic

Improveable: he could talk a bit faster

Introduction: ok

Overview: ok

Interesting Content: Yes, but maybe a bit dry

'Signposting': yes

Body language: good, he was relaxed

Eye contact: good (he had no notes, therefore he was able to talk to the audience directly)

Audience involvement: no

Visuals: good (easy to read, supported the speaker)

Language: clear

name: Christoph
B1: Submit
Date: August 23, 2001
Time: 11:34

christoph_feedback

I think that the the body language was good. Clear and understandable voice.

Maybe I could improve by talking more freely.

Introduction: +

clear overview: ++

clear structure: ++

interesting content: =, it depends whether you are interested or not

clear 'signposting':maybe, I don't know

good body language: ++

eye contact: +

audience involvement: -

designing and using visuals: +, very formal slides, no pictures

language: +

norbert_feedback

Good: very good body language, clear voice

Improveable: more eye contact and less looking on the sheeds

nice introduction: ++

clear overview: +

clear structure: ++

interesting content: +, for me it's interesting, but for somebody other it could be a little bit dry

clear 'signposting: +

good body language: ++, very good

eye contact: +,=, maybe improveable

audience involvement: =

designing and using visuals: ++

language: +

peter_feedback

good: very good bodylanguage and eye contact, I liked that you spoke very freely without help!

improveable: maybe pronounciation from words like success,

nice introduction: ++

clear overview: +

clear structure: ++

interesting content: +, like the whole presentation it depends whether you like the topic or not clear 'signposting': + good body language: ++

eye contact: ++

audience involvement: -

designing and using visuals: +, formal and very interesting slides...i liked also the graph!

language: +

name: Max
B1: Submit
Date: August 23, 2001
Time: 11:40

christoph_feedback

You waaas soooo goood! Your presentation was ok. Perhaps, you were a little bit nervous. Nevertheless, you spoke very clearly.

norbert_feedback

You should have worn your suit! Apart from this fact it was ok.

peter_feedback

You did a good job. Good eye contact, you spoke freely, good body language etc.

name: Peter
B1: Submit
Date: August 23, 2001
Time: 12:20

christoph_feedback

I think that your language was quite rich, you used good expressions and connecting phrases. The structure of your part was clear, good introduction and signposting. May be a further improvement could be achieved by using shorter sentences (for example by deviding them into 3 parts as Matthew advised) or by faster speed and contentrating on intonation. May be you were a little nervous but it can be improved by practising. I think that our topic was a little dry for the audience, however i've found it interesting. But we should bear in mind that we want our audince to be happy with our presentation. Generally i think that you've made good work and you will benefit from it later using your english and presentation practise as well the useful information about this topic.

norbert_feedback

I think your english has improved very much. Your vocabulary is reach, the gramar is correct and you've developed your delivery rather impressively by concentrating on intonation and the right speed. To use the example of the stationary made your presentation more clear and interesting. I can see further improvement possibilities making your presentation more talkative trying to feel more free from your notes. The improvment of the pronanciation could have a positive impact on your english. Generally i think that you've performed very well.

peter_feedback

May be i can see a little improvement compering the presentations before. A little improvement in intonation, speed and delivery. I tried to concnetrate on deviding my thoughts into 3 parts, i think it works. However i have to carry on improving this skills. I also have to make my active vocabulary richer and my grammar more confident.

name: Martin
B1: Submit
Date: August 23, 2001
Time: 12:29

christoph_feedback

Good: self confident and professional.

Improveable: try to be a little bit more relaxed

Introduction: very nice, good and short

Overview: very good

Interesting Content: Yes, but only for business students

'Signposting': very good

Body language: excellent

Eye contact: very good

Audience involvement: -

Visuals: have been more or less okay, maybe a little bit boring.

Language: has been your best performance

P.s.: You were so good ups, sorry you was so good

norbert_feedback

Good: self confident and professional.

Improveable: try to be a little bit formal more and try to stand on one place.

Introduction: ok

Overview: very good

Interesting Content: Yes, but only for business students

'Signposting': very good

Body language: excellent

Eye contact: very good

Audience involvement: -

Visuals: have been more or less okay, maybe a little bit boring.

Language: very good

peter_feedback

Good: self confident and very relaxed style.

Improveable: try to be a little bit formal more and try to stand on one place. Maybe also to speed a little bit more up and short pausing.

Introduction: ok

Overview: very good

Interesting Content: Yes, but only for business students

'Signposting': very good

Body language: excellent

Eye contact: very good

Audience involvement: -

Visuals: have been more or less okay, maybe a little bit boring.

Language: very good

name: Sepp
B1: Submit
Date: October 22, 2001
Time: 18:24

christoph_feedback

You were the best!

norbert_feedback

peter_feedback